4.6 Article

Human CCR4+CCR6+Th17 Cells Suppress Autologous CD8+ T Cell Responses

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 188, Issue 12, Pages 6055-6062

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102918

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 738]
  2. Helmholtz Association within Helmholtz Alliance on Immunotherapy of Cancer
  3. Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of Th17 cells in cancer patients remains unclear and controversial. In this study, we have analyzed the phenotype of in vitro primed Th17 cells and further characterized their function on the basis of CCR4 and CCR6 expression. We show a novel function for a subset of IL-17-secreting CD4(+) T cells, namely, CCR4(+)CCR6(+) Th17 cells. When cultured together, CCR4(+)CCR6(+)Th17 cells suppressed the lytic function, proliferation, and cytokine secretion of both Ag-specific and CD3/CD28/CD2-stimulated autologous CD8(+) T cells. In contrast, CCR4(-)CCR6(+) CD4(+) T cells, which also secrete IL-17, did not affect the CD8(+) T cells. Suppression of CD8+ T cells by CCR4(+)CCR6(+)Th17 cells was partially dependent on TGF-beta, because neutralization of TGF-beta in cocultures reversed their suppressor function. In addition, we also found an increase in the frequency of CCR4(+)CCR6(+), but not CCR4(-) CCR6(+) Th17 cells in peripheral blood of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Our study not only underlies the importance of analysis of subsets within Th17 cells to understand their function, but also suggests Th17 cells as yet another immune evasion mechanism in hepatocellular carcinoma. This has important implications when studying the mechanisms of carcinogenesis, as well as designing effective immunotherapy protocols for patients with cancer. The Journal of Immunology, 2012, 188: 6055-6062.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available