4.6 Article

Epigenetic Changes at Il12rb2 and Tbx21 in Relation to Plasticity Behavior of Th17 Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 186, Issue 6, Pages 3373-3382

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003216

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  3. MRC [G0601174, G0800034] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0601174, G0800034] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plasticity within Th cell populations may play a role in enabling site-specific immune responses to infections while limiting tissue destruction. Epigenetic processes are fundamental to such plasticity; however, to date, most investigations have focused on in vitro-generated T cells. In this study, we have examined the molecular mechanisms underpinning murine Th17 plasticity in vivo by assessing H3K4 and H3K27 trimethylation marks at Tbx21, Rorc, Il17a, Ifng, and Il12rb2 loci in purified ex vivo-isolated and in vitro-generated Th17 cells. Although both populations had largely comparable epigenetic signatures, including bivalent marks at Tbx21, freshly isolated ex vivo Th17 cells displayed restricted expression from Il12rb2 due to the presence of repressive chromatin modifications. This receptor, however, could be upregulated on isolated ex vivo Th17 cells after in vitro activation or by in vivo immunization and was augmented by the presence of IFN-gamma. Such activated cells could then be deviated toward a Th1-like profile. We show that IL-12 stimulation removes H3K27 trimethylation modifications at Tbx21/T-bet leading to enhanced T-bet expression with in vitro Th17 cells. Our study reveals important potential phenotypic differences between ex vivo-and in vitro-generated Th17 cells and provides mechanistic insight into Th17 cell plasticity. The Journal of Immunology, 2011, 186: 3373-3382.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available