4.6 Article

Impaired Apoptotic Cell Clearance in the Germinal Center by Mer-Deficient Tingible Body Macrophages Leads to Enhanced Antibody-Forming Cell and Germinal Center Responses

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 185, Issue 10, Pages 5859-5868

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001187

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AR055701, R01DE017590]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Germinal centers (GCs) are specialized microenvironments that generate high-affinity Ab-forming cells (AFCs) and memory B cells. Many B cells undergo apoptosis during B cell clonal selection in GCs. Although the factors that regulate the AFC and GC responses are not precisely understood, it is widely believed that dysregulated AFCs and GCs contribute to autoimmunity. The Mer receptor tyrosine kinase (Mer) facilitates macrophage clearance of apoptotic cells. The Tyro-3, Axl, and Mer receptors, including Mer, suppress TLRs and cytokine-mediated inflammatory responses. We report in this study that tingible body macrophages (TBM phi s) in GCs express Mer. Compared to C57BL/6 (B6) controls, Mer-deficient (Mer(-/-)) mice had significantly higher AFC, GC, and Th1-skewed IgG2 Ab (especially IgG2c) responses against the T cell-dependent Ag (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl) acetyl-chicken gamma globulin. Mer(-/-) mice had a significantly higher percentage of GC B cells on days 9, 14, and 21 postimmunization compared with B6 controls. Significantly increased numbers of apoptotic cells accumulated in Mer(-/-) GCs than in B6 GCs, whereas the number of TBM phi s remained similar in both strains. Our data are the first, to our knowledge, to demonstrate a critical role for Mer in GC apoptotic cell clearance by TBM phi s and have interesting implications for Mer in the regulation of B cell tolerance operative in the AFC and GC pathways. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 185: 5859-5868.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available