4.6 Article

HIV Immune Escape at an Immunodominant Epitope in HLA-B*27-Positive Individuals Predicts Viral Load Outcome

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 186, Issue 1, Pages 479-488

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903227

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council
  3. Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CTL response in HLA-B* 27(+) HIV-infected individuals is characterized by an immunodominant response to a conserved epitope in gag p24 (aa 263-272, KRWIILGLNK; KK10). Mutations resulting in substitution of the arginine (R264) at position 2 of this epitope have been identified as escape mutations. Nineteen HLA-B* 27(+) long-term nonprogressors were identified from an Australian cohort with an average follow-up of 16 y following infection. Viral and host genetic factors impacting on disease progression were determined at multiple time points. Twelve of 19 had wild-type sequences at codon 264 at all time points; 7 of 19 carried CTL escape variants. Median viral load and CD4(+) T cell counts were not significantly different between these groups at enrollment. Viral load, as judged by levels at their last visit (1,700 and 21,000 RNA copies/ml, respectively; p = 0.01) or by time-weighted area under the curve was higher in the escape group (p = 0.02). Escape mutants at other HLA-B* 27-restricted epitopes were uncommon. Moreover, host polymorphisms, such as CCR5 Delta 32, CCR2-64I, and SDF1-3 ' A, or breadth of TCR repertoire responding to KK10 did not segregate to wild-type or escape groups. Host and viral factors were examined for a relationship to viral load. The only factor to affect viral load was the presence of the R264 escape mutations at the immunodominant epitope. CTL escape at R264 in the KK10 epitope is a major determinant of subsequent viral load in these HLA-B* 27(+) individuals. The Journal of Immunology, 2011, 186: 479-488.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available