4.6 Article

PU.1 Binds to a Distal Regulatory Element That Is Necessary for B Cell-Specific Expression of CIITA

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 184, Issue 9, Pages 5018-5028

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000079

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI34000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The transcriptional coactivator CIITA regulates MHC class II genes. In the mouse, CIITA is expressed from three distinct promoters (pI, pIII, and pIV) in a developmental and cell type-specific manner with pill being responsible for B lymphocyte-specific expression. Although the promoter proximal sequences that regulate CIITA in B cells have been described, nothing is known about additional distal elements that may regulate its expression in B cells. Sequence homology comparisons, DNase I hypersensitivity assays, and histone modification analysis revealed a potential regulatory element located 11 kb upstream of pill. Deletion of this element, termed hypersensitive site 1 (HSS1), in a bacterial artificial chromosome encoding the entire CIITA locus and surrounding genes, resulted in a complete loss of CIITA expression from the bacterial artificial chromosome following transfection into B cells. HSS1 and pIII displayed open chromatin architecture features in B cell but not in plasma cell lines, which are silenced for CIITA expression. PU.1 was found to bind HSS1 and pill in B cells but not in plasma cells. Depletion of PU.1 by short hairpin RNA reduced CIITA expression. Chromatin conformation capture assays showed that HSS1 interacted directly with pIII in B cells and that PU.1 was important for this interaction. These results provide evidence that HSS1 is required for B cell-specific expression of CIITA and that HSS1 functions by interacting with pill, forming a long-distance chromatin loop that is partly mediated through PU.1. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 184: 5018-5028.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available