4.6 Article

TLR9 Is Actively Recruited to Aspergillus fumigatus Phagosomes and Requires the N-Terminal Proteolytic Cleavage Domain for Proper Intracellular Trafficking

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 185, Issue 12, Pages 7614-7622

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002760

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [K08 AI-057999]
  2. Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TLR9 recognizes unmethylated CpG DNA and induces innate immune responses. TLR9 activation is a multistep process requiring proteolytic cleavage and trafficking to endolysosomal compartments for ligand-induced signaling. However, the rules that govern the dynamic subcellular trafficking for TLR9 after pathogen uptake have not been established. In this study, we demonstrate that uptake of Aspergillus fumigatus conidia induced drastic spatial redistribution of TLR9 to the phagosomal membrane of A. fumigatus-containing phagosomes but not to bead-containing phagosomes in murine macrophages. Specific TLR9 recruitment to the fungal phagosome was consistent using A. fumigatus spores at different germination stages and selected mutants affecting the display of Ags on the fungal cell surface. Spatiotemporal regulation of TLR9 compartmentalization to the A. fumigatus phagosome was independent of TLR2, TLR4, and downstream TLR signaling. Our data demonstrate that the TLR9 N-terminal proteolytic cleavage domain was critical for successful intracellular trafficking and accumulation of TLR9 in CpG-containing compartments and A. fumigatus phagosomal membranes. Our study provides evidence for a model in which A. fumigatus spore phagocytosis by macrophages specifically induces TLR9 recruitment to A. fumigatus phagosomes and may thereby mediate TLR9-induced antifungal innate immune responses. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 185: 7614-7622.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available