4.6 Article

Persistent gamma-Herpesvirus Infection Induces a CD4 T Cell Response Containing Functionally Distinct Effector Populations

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 184, Issue 7, Pages 3850-3856

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902935

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI-59603]
  2. Research Institute
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI059603] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The direct effector mechanisms of CD4 T cells during gamma-herpesvirus 68 (gamma HV68)-persistent infection are less well understood than those of their CD8 T cell counterparts, although there is substantial evidence that CD4 T cells are critical for the control of persistent gamma-herpesvirus infection. Our results show that in gamma HV68-persistently infected mice, CD4 T cells are not cytokine polyfunctional, but there is a division of labor in the CD4 T cell compartment in which CD4 T cells polarize toward two distinct populations with different effector functions: IFN-gamma producers and CD107(+) cytolytic effectors. These two CD4 T cell effector populations degranulate and produce IFN-gamma during steady state without need for exogenous antigenic restimulation, which is fundamentally different from that observed with gamma HV68-specific CD8 T cells. By using anti-IFN-gamma Ab depletions and IFN-gamma-deficient mice, we show that CD4 T cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vivo is not dependent on IFN-gamma activity. In addition, our data show that purified CD4 T cells isolated from gamma HV68-latently infected mice have the capacity to inhibit gamma HV68 reactivation from latency. Our results support the concept that CD4 T cells are critical effectors for the control of gamma-herpesvirus latent infection, and they mediate this effect by two independent mechanisms: IFN-gamma production and cytotoxicity. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 184: 3850-3856.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available