4.6 Article

Remarkable Conservation of Distinct Nonclassical MHC Class I Lineages in Divergent Amphibian Species

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 186, Issue 1, Pages 372-381

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001467

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [F31-AI068610, AI27877, R03-HD-06167-01, R24-AI-059830]
  2. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R03HD061671] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R29AI027877, F31AI068610, R24AI059830, R01AI027877] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nonclassical MHC class Ib (class Ib) genes are heterogeneous genes encoding molecules that are structurally similar to classical MHC class Ia molecules but with limited tissue distribution and polymorphism. Mammalian class Ib genes have diverse and often uncharacterized functions, and because of their rapid rate of evolution, class Ib phylogeny is difficult to establish. We have conducted an extensive genomic, molecular, and phylogenetic characterization of class Ib genes in two Xenopodinae amphibian species of different genera that diverged from a common ancestor as long ago as primates and rodents (similar to 65 million years). In contrast with the unsteadiness of mammalian class Ib genes, our results reveal an unusual degree of conservation of most Xenopodinae class Ib gene lineages, including a novel monogenic lineage represented by the divergent Xenopus laevis XNC10 gene and its unequivocal Silurana (Xenopus) tropicalis orthologue, SNC10. The preferential expression of this gene lineage by thymocytes themselves from the onset of thymic organogenesis is consistent with a specialized role of class Ib in early T cell development and suggests such a function is conserved in all tetrapods. The Journal of Immunology, 2011, 186: 372-381.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available