4.6 Article

Sex Steroid Ablation Enhances Immune Reconstitution Following Cytotoxic Antineoplastic Therapy in Young Mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 184, Issue 11, Pages 6014-6024

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802445

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Norwood Immunology
  2. Australian Stem Cell Centre
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council
  4. Cancer Council of Victoria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cytotoxic antineoplastic therapy is used to treat malignant disease but results in long-term immunosuppression in postpubertal and adult individuals, leading to increased incidence and severity of opportunistic infections. We have previously shown that sex steroid ablation (SSA) reverses immunodeficiencies associated with age and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in both autologous and allogeneic settings. In this study, we have assessed the effects of SSA by surgical castration on T cell recovery of young male mice following cyclophosphamide treatment as a model for the impact of chemotherapy. SSA increased thymic cellularity, involving all of the thymocyte subsets and early T lineage progenitors. It also induced early repair of damage to the thymic stromal microenvironment, which is crucial to the recovery of a fully functional T cell-based immune system. These functional changes in thymic stromal subsets included enhanced production of growth factors and chemokines important for thymopoiesis, which preceded increases in both thymocyte and stromal cellularity. These effects collectively translated to an increase in peripheral and splenic naive T cells. In conclusion, SSA enhances T cell recovery following cyclophosphamide treatment of mice, at the level of the thymocytes and their stromal niches. This provides a new approach to immune reconstitution following antineoplastic therapy. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 184: 6014-6024.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available