4.6 Article

Selective Mobilization of Cytotoxic Leukocytes by Epinephrine

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 184, Issue 1, Pages 503-511

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902189

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [654]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well-known that acute stress, presumably as a first defense against pathogens, enhances PBMC counts by mobilizing these beta 2-adrenoceptor positive cells from the marginal pool. Yet, only select leukocyte subsets participate in this phenomenon of adrenergic leukocytosis and underlying mechanisms are obscure. In this study, we analyzed in human blood adhesion molecule and chemokine receptor profiles in 14 leukocyte subsets, and responsiveness of subsets to epinephrine in vivo and in vitro. Five subsets, namely, CCR7(-)CD45RA(+)CD8(+) effector T cells, CD4(-)CD8(-)gamma/delta T cells, CD3(+)CD56(+) NKT-like cells, CD16(+)CD56(dim) cytotoxic INK cells, and CD14(dim)CD16(+) proinflammatory monocytes showed a rapid and transient increase after infusion of epinephrine at physiological concentrations. These cells were characterized by a CD62L(-)CD11(bright)CX3CR(bright) phenotype, whereby expression of both CD11a and CX3CR1 was strongly correlated with adrenergic leukocytosis in vivo (r = 0.86 and 0.78, p < 0.005). The same subsets showed highest adherence to activated endothelium in vitro, which (except for proinflammatory monocytes) was reversed by epinephrine. We conclude that these five cytotoxic effector leukocyte subsets comprise the marginal pool by a CD11a/CX3CR1-mediated attachment to the endothelium. Epinephrine rapidly attenuates this attachment to allow demargination and release of the cells into the circulation that, because of their cytotoxic effector function, provide immediate protection from invading pathogens. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 184: 503-511.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available