4.6 Article

Interactions between Human NK Cells and Macrophages in Response to Salmonella Infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 182, Issue 7, Pages 4339-4348

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803329

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G9800943, G0401569] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Medical Research Council [G0401569, G9800943] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline
  4. MRC [G0401569, G9800943] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NK cells play a key role in host resistance to a range of pathogenic microorganisms, particularly during the initial stages of infection. NK cell interactions with cells infected with viruses and parasites have been studied extensively, but human bacterial infections have not been given the same attention. We studied crosstalk between human NK cells and macrophages infected with intracellular Salmonella. These macrophages activated NK cells, resulting in secretion of IFN-gamma and degranulation. Reciprocally, NK cell activation led to a dramatic reduction in numbers of intramacrophagic live bacteria. We identified three elements in the interaction of NK cells with infected macrophages. First, communication between NK cells and infected macrophages was contact-dependent. The second requirement was IL-2- and/or IL-15-dependent priming of NK cells to produce IFN-gamma. The third was activation of NK cells by IL-12 and IL-18, which were secreted by the Salmonella-infected macrophages. Adhesion molecules and IL-12R beta 2 were enriched in the contact zone between NK cells and macrophages, consistent with contact- and IL-12/IL-18-dependent NK activation. Our results suggest that, in humans, bacterial clearance is consistent with a model invoking a menage a trois involving NK cells, IL-2/IL-15-secreting cells, and infected macrophages. The Journal of Immunology, 2009,182: 4339-4348.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available