4.6 Article

Identification and Characterization of a Human CD5+ Pre-Naive B Cell Population

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 182, Issue 7, Pages 4116-4126

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803391

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. Korea Research Foundation [KRF-2005-331-E00123]
  4. Jean et Linette Warnery Foundation
  5. Swiss Foundation for Medical-Biological Scholarships

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have identified a distinct pre-naive B cell population circulating in human peripheral blood that exhibits an intermediate phenotype between transitional and naive B cells. Like human transitional B cells, these cells express CD5 but have intermediate densities of CD38, CD10, CD9, and the ABCB1 transporter compared with transitional and naive B cells. These pre-naive B cells account for a majority of circulating human CD5(+) B cells. Importantly, CD5(+) pre-naive B cells could be induced to differentiate into cells with a naive phenotype in vitro. CD5(+) pre-naive B cells show only partial responses to BCR stimulation and CD40 ligation and undergo more spontaneous apoptosis and cell death than do naive B cells, whereas BAFF/BLyS (B cell-activating factor belonging to the TNF family) did not enhance their survival compared with naive B cells. In contrast, CD5+ pre-naive B cells carry out certain functions comparable to naive B cells, including the capacity to differentiate into plasma cells and the ability to function as APCs. Notably, an increased proportion of CD5+ pre-naive B cells were found in peripheral blood of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. These results have identified a unique intermediate in human naive B cell development within the peripheral blood and derangements of its homeostasis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 182: 4116-4126.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available