4.6 Article

Reversal of Human Papillomavirus-Specific T Cell Immune Suppression through TLR Agonist Treatment of Langerhans Cells Exposed to Human Papillomavirus Type 16

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 182, Issue 5, Pages 2919-2928

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803645

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA 74397]
  2. Whittier Foundation
  3. National Institutes of Health Training [T32 AI07078, 132 GM06075H7]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 infects the epithelial layer of cervical mucosa and is causally associated with the generation of cervical cancer. Langerhans cells (LC) are the resident APCs at the site of infection and therefore are responsible for initiating an immune response against HPV16. On the contrary, LC exposed to HPV16 do not induce a specific T cell immune response, which leads to the immune evasion of HPV16. Demonstrating that TLR7 and TLR8 are expressed on human LC, we hypothesized that imidazoquinolines would activate LC exposed to HPV16, leading to the induction of an HPV16-specific cell-mediated immune response. Surprisingly, both phenotypic and functional hallmarks of activation are not observed when LC are exposed to HPV16 virus-like particles and treated with imiquimod (TLR7 agonist). However, we found that LC are activated by 3M-002 (TLR8 agonist) and resiquimod (TLR8/7 agonist). LC exposed to HPV16 virus-like particles and subsequently treated with 3M-002 or resiquimod highly up-regulate surface activation markers, secrete proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, induce CCL21-directed migration, and initiate an HPV16-specific CD8(+) T cell response. These data strongly indicate that 3M-002 and resiquimod are promising therapeutics for treatment of HPV infections and HPV-induced cervical lesions. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 182: 2919-2928.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available