4.8 Article

Experimental study on low-temperature organic Rankine cycle utilizing scroll type expander

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages 150-159

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.118

Keywords

Organic Rankine cycle; Low-temperature; Scroll expander; Waste heat recovery; Superheating

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China, Taiwan [MOST 103-2221-E-027-106]
  2. National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan [103T140]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on experimental performance of an open-drive scroll type expander in an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system. The expander was an originally oil-free scroll type air compressor with a built-in volume ratio of 4.05. The cycle used HFC-245fa as working fluid, and the loop has been mixed with a moderate concentration of refrigerant oil that circulated in the cycle. The experimental results of this study are divided into two main parts: first part focuses the experimental performance on the fixed superheating at the expander inlet with respect to various pressure differences of the system and rotational speeds of the expander. Second part involves various superheating at the expander inlet which was operated at fixed rotational speed and operating pressure difference of 5 bars and 6 bars. When the cycle was operated under fixed superheating conditions, the maximum cycle efficiency, expander efficiency and power output of the expander are 9.44%, 73.1% and 23 kW respectively. On the other hand, when the expander is operated in various superheating conditions, the expander and cycle efficiency simultaneously increase with the increasing of superheating. In addition, this paper not only focuses on the experimental results using the current expander, but also integrates the previous experimental data with present study to identify an appropriate scroll type expander with respect to various operating pressure differences for the heat source below 100 degrees C. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available