4.6 Article

TLR4 Ligands Induce IFN-α Production by Mouse Conventional Dendritic Cells and Human Monocytes after IFN-β Priming

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 182, Issue 2, Pages 820-828

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.182.2.820

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [PO1 AR050256]
  2. Societe Francaise de Rhumatologic
  3. Centre Hospitalier de Bordeaux
  4. Reseau Rhumatologic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exacerbation of disease in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with bacterial infection. In conventional dendritic cells (cDCs), the TLR4 ligand bacterial LIPS induces IFN-beta gene expression but does not induce IFN-alpha. We hypothesized that when cDCs are primed by cytokines, as may frequently be the case in SLE, LPS would then induce the production of IFN-alpha, a cytokine believed to be important in lupus pathogenesis. In this study we show that mouse cDCs and human monocytes produce abundant IFN-alpha following TLR4 engagement whether the cells have been pretreated either with IFN-beta or with a supernatant from DCs activated by RNA-containing immune complexes from lupus patients. This TLR4-induced IFN-alpha induction is mediated by both an initial TRIF-dependent pathway and a subsequent MyD88-dependent pathway, in contrast to TLR3-induced IFN-alpha production, which is entirely TRIF-dependent. There is also a distinct requirement for IFN regulatory factors (IRFs), with LPS-induced IFN-alpha induction being entirely IRF7- and partially IRF5-dependent, in contrast to LIPS -induced IFN-beta gene induction which is known to be IRF3-dependent but largely IRF7-independent. This data demonstrates a novel pathway for IFN-alpha production by cDCs and provides one possible explanation for how bacterial infection might precipitate disease Hares in SLE. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 182: 820-828.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available