4.6 Article

Tryptophan Deprivation Induces Inhibitory Receptors ILT3 and ILT4 on Dendritic Cells Favoring the Induction of Human CD4+CD25+ Foxp3+ T Regulatory Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 183, Issue 1, Pages 145-154

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803277

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 704/TP A15]
  2. BONFOR
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21590353] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tryptophan catabolism through IDO activity can cause nonresponsiveness and tolerance acting on T cells. Given the crucial importance of dendritic cells (DCs) in the initiation of a T cell response, surprisingly little is known about the impact of IDO activity and tryptophan deprivation on DCs themselves. In the present study, we show that human DCs differentiated under low-tryptophan conditions acquire strong tolerogenic capacity. This effect is associated with a markedly decreased Ag uptake as well as the down-regulation of costimulatory molecules (CD40, CD80). In contrast, the inhibitory receptors ILT3 and ILT4 are significantly increased. Functionally, tryptophan-deprived DCs show a reduced capacity to stimulate T cells, which can be restored by blockade of ILT3. Moreover, ILT3(high)ILT4(high) DCs lead to the induction of CD4(+)CD25(+) Foxp3(+) T regulatory cells with suppressive activity from CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells. The generation of ILT3(high)ILT4(high) DCs with tolerogenic properties by tryptophan deprivation is linked to a stress response pathway mediated by the GCN2 kinase. These results demonstrate that tryptophan degradation establishes a regulatory microenvironment for DCs, enabling these cells to induce T regulatory cells. The impact of IDO thus extends beyond local immune suppression to a systemic control of the immune response. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 183: 145-154.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available