4.6 Article

Neutrophil-toxin interactions promote antigen delivery and mucosal clearance of Streptococcus pneumoniae

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 180, Issue 9, Pages 6246-6254

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.9.6246

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 44231, AI 38446] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK 50306] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Delivery of Ag to inductive sites, such as nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) or GALT, is thought to promote mucosal immunity. Host and microbial factors that contribute to this process were investigated during model murine airway colonization by the pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae. Colonization led to the deposition of released bacterial capsular Ag in the NALT in a manner consistent with trafficking through M cells. This Ag was derived from processing of bacteria in the lumen of the paranasal spaces rather than through invasion or sampling of intact bacteria. Neutrophils, which are recruited to the paranasal spaces where they associate with and may degrade bacteria, were required for efficient Ag delivery. Maximal Ag delivery to the NALT also required expression of the bacterial toxin pneumolysin. Pneumolysin and pneumolysin-expressing bacteria lysed neutrophils through pore formation in vitro. Accordingly, a pneumolysin-dependent loss of neutrophils, which correlated with the increased release of bacterial products, was observed in vivo. Thus, delivery of Ag to the NALT was enhanced by neutrophil-mediated generation of bacterial products together with bacterial-induced lysis of neutrophils. The impaired Ag delivery of pneumolysin-deficient bacteria was associated with diminished clearance from the mucosal surface. This study demonstrates how microbial-host interactions affect Ag delivery and the effectiveness of mucosal immunity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available