4.6 Article

The Effector T Cells of Diabetic Subjects Are Resistant to Regulation via CD4+FOXP3+ Regulatory T Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 181, Issue 10, Pages 7350-7355

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.10.7350

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Benaroya Research Institute
  2. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Center for Translational Research
  3. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation [33-2008-398]
  4. Dana Foundation [R01 DK072457]
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [1083/2-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Defects in immune regulation have been implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetes in mouse and in man. In vitro assays using autologous regulatory (Treg) and responder effector (Tell) T cells have shown that suppression is impaired in diabetic subjects. In this study, we addressed whether the source of this defect is intrinsic to the Treg or Teff compartment of diabetic subjects. We first established that in type I diabetes (T1D) individuals, similar levels of impaired suppression were seen, irrespective of whether natural (nTreg) or adaptive Treg (aTreg) were present. Then using aTreg, we examined the ability of T1D aTreg to suppress Teff of healthy controls, as compared with the ability of control aTreg to suppress Teff of diabetic subjects. Taking this approach, we found that the aTregs from T1D subjects function normally in the presence of control Teff, and that the T1D Teff were resistant to suppression in the presence of control aTreg. This escape from regulation was seen with nTreg as well and was not transferred to control Teff coincubated with T1D Teff. Thus, the defective regulation in T1D is predominantly due to the resistance of responding T cells to Treg and is a characteristic intrinsic to the T1D Teff. This has implications with respect to pathogenic mechanisms, which underlie the development of disease and the target of therapies for T1D. The Journal of Immunology, 2008, 181: 7350-7355.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available