4.6 Article

Hepatitis C Virus Immune Escape via Exploitation of a Hole in the T Cell Repertoire

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 181, Issue 9, Pages 6435-6446

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.9.6435

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Damon Runyon Foundation
  2. Dana Foundation
  3. W. W. Smith Charitable Trust
  4. U.S. Public Health Service [K08 DA11880, U 19 AI040035, R01 DK57998]
  5. National Institutes of Health [CA33084, CA18029]
  6. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society [7040-03]
  7. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  8. Deutsche Krebshilfe, Germany
  9. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection frequently persists despite eliciting substantial virus-specific immune responses. Thus, HCV infection provides a setting in which to investigate mechanisms of immune escape that allow for viral persistence. Viral amino acid substitutions resulting in decreased MHC binding or impaired Ag processing of T cell epitopes reduce Ag density on the cell surface, permitting evasion of T cell responses in chronic viral infection. Substitutions in viral epitopes that alter TCR contact residues frequently result in escape, but via unclear mechanisms because such substitutions do not reduce surface presentation of peptide-MHC complexes and would he expected to prime T cells with new specificities. We demonstrate that a known in vivo HCV mutation involving a TCR contact residue significantly diminishes T cell recognition and, in contrast to the original sequence, fails to effectively prime naive T cells. This mutant epitope thus escapes de novo immune recognition because there are few highly specific cognate TCR among the primary human T cell repertoire. This example is the first on viral immune escape via exploitation of a hole in the T cell repertoire, and may represent an important general mechanism of viral persistence. The Journal of Immunology, 2008,181: 6435-6446.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available