4.6 Article

CD28 costimulation is essential for human T regulatory expansion and function

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 181, Issue 4, Pages 2855-2868

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.4.2855

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA105216, P01CA670493, R01 CA105216-03, R01 CA113783, R01CA105216, R01 CA113783-03, R01 CA113783-04] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL056067, T32 HL007775, R37HL56067, R37 HL056067] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI057838-01A1, R01 AI057838-02, R01 AI057838-05, R01AI057838, R01 AI057838-03, R01 AI057838, R01 AI057838-04] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The costimulatory requirements required for peripheral blood T regulatory cells (Tregs) are unclear. Using cell-based artificial APCs we found that CD28 but not ICOS, OX40, 4-1BB, CD27, or CD40 ligand costimulation maintained high levels of Foxp3 expression and in vitro suppressive function. Only CD28 costimulation in the presence of rapamycin consistently generated Tregs that consistently suppressed xenogeneic graft-vs-host disease in immunodeficient mice. Restimulation of Tregs after 8-12 days of culture with CD28 costimulation in the presence of rapamycin resulted in >1000-fold expansion of Tregs in <3 wk. Next, we determined whether other costimulatory pathways could augment the replicative potential of CD28-costimulated Tregs. We observed that while OX40 costimulation augmented the proliferative capacity of CD28-costimulated Tregs, Foxp3 expression and suppressive function were diminished. These studies indicate that the costimulatory requirements for expanding Tregs differ from those for T effector cells and, furthermore, they extend findings from mouse Tregs to demonstrate that human postthymic Tregs require CD28 costimulation to expand and maintain potent suppressive function in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available