4.6 Article

Stable CD8+ T cell memory during persistent Trypanosoma cruzi infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 181, Issue 4, Pages 2644-2650

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.4.2644

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-033106, R01 AI033106, AI-022070, R01 AI022070, R01 AI033106-14, R01 AI022070-19] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CD8(+) T cell responses to persistent infections caused by intracellular pathogens are dominated by resting T effectors and T effector memory cells, with little evidence suggesting that a T central memory (T(CM)) population is generated. Using a model of Trypanosoma cruzi infection, we demonstrate that in contrast to the T effector/T effector memory phenotype of the majority of T. cruzi-specific CD8(+) T cells, a population of cells displaying hallmark characteristics of T,m cells is also present during long-term persistent infection. This population expressed the T,m marker CD127 and a subset expressed one or more of three other T(CM) markers: CD62L, CCR7, and CD122. Additionally, the majority of CD127(high) cells were KLRG1(low), indicating that they have not been repetitively activated through TCR stimulation. These CD127(high) cells were better maintained than their CD127(low) counterparts following transfer into naive mice, consistent with their observed surface expression of CD127 and CD122, which confer the ability to self-renew in response to IL-7 and IL-15. CD127(high) cells were capable of IFN-gamma production upon peptide restimulation and expanded in response to challenge infection, indicating that these cells are functionally responsive upon Ag re-encounter. These results are in contrast to what is typically observed during many persistent infections and indicate that a stable population of parasite-specific CD8(+) T cells capable of Ag-independent survival is maintained in mice despite the presence of persistent Ag.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available