4.6 Article

B cell depletion with anti-CD79 mAbs ameliorates autoimmune disease in MRL/lpr mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 181, Issue 5, Pages 2961-2972

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.5.2961

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Lupus Research Institute
  2. Arthritis Foundation and the Alliance for Lupus Research
  3. Lupus Foundation of South New Jersey
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs
  5. National Institutes of Health [R01-AR-34156, U19-AI-46358, R01-AI063626, R01-DE017590]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MRL/lpr mice develop a spontaneous systemic lupus erythematosus-like autoimmune syndrome due to a dysfunctional Fas receptor, with contributions from other less well-defined genetic loci. The removal of B cells by genetic manipulation not only prevents autoantibody formation, but it also results in substantially reduced T cell activation and kidney inflammation. To determine whether B cell depletion by administration of Abs is effective in lupus mice with an intact immune system and established disease, we screened several B cell-specific mAbs and found that a combination of anti-CD79 alpha and anti-CD79 beta Abs was most effective at depleting B cells in vivo. Anti-CD79 therapy started at 4-5 mo of age in MRL/lpr mice significantly decreased B cells (B220(+)CD19(+)) in peripheral blood, bone marrow, and spleens. Treated mice also had a significant increase in the number of both double-negative T cells and naive CD4(+) T cells, and a decreased relative abundance of CD4(+) memory cells. Serum anti-chromatin IgG levels were significantly decreased compared with controls, whereas serum anti-dsDNA IgG, total IgG, or total IgM were unaffected. Overall, survival was improved with lower mean skin scores and significantly fewer focal inflammatory infiltrates in submandibular salivary glands and kidneys. Anti-CD79 mAbs show promise as a potential treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus and as a model for B cell depletion in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available