4.2 Article

Comparison of the results obtained by ELISA and surface plasmon resonance for the determination of antibody affinity

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 352, Issue 1-2, Pages 13-22

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2009.10.002

Keywords

Fibronectin-antibody interaction; Surface plasmon resonance; Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; Dissociation rate constant; Association rate constant; Equilibrium dissociation constant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to compare the affinity values obtained for a monoclonal antibody/antigen complex using two different techniques, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) approach recently described by Bobrovnik S.A. and by Stevens F.J. These two techniques can be used in particular to determine the equilibrium dissociation constant, K(D), of the complex in solution or on a surface. Bobrovnik's method gives two K(D) values that differ by a factor of 100, demonstrating that two populations of complexes are present in solution. In an initial step, one protein binds relatively weakly to the other (high K(D)) and this is followed by a conformational change in the most flexible portion of the antigen, which increases the affinity (low K(D)). Only the higher of the two K(D) values can be detected when complex formation in solution is investigated using SPR, because the interaction measured concerns the fibronectin/antibody complexes of lowest affinity. In contrast, when measuring association at the sensor surface, SPR gives an average result between the two K(D) values because complexes corresponding to both affinities can form in this situation. The constants that characterise the kinetics of the fibronectin-antibody interaction obtained by SPR and ELISA are therefore different, because the methods do not allow the same phenomena to be observed. However they are consistent and complementary. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available