4.2 Article

Rapid identification and sorting of viable virus-reactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells based on antigen-triggered CD137 expression

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 339, Issue 1, Pages 23-37

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2008.07.017

Keywords

CD137; CD4(+) T cells; CD8(+) Tcells; T-cell monitoring; Cell sorting

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB432/A13, KFO183/TP5]
  2. Rhineland-Palatinate immunology cluster Immunointervention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current methods for the detection and isolation of antigen-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells require the availability of peptide/MHC multimers or are restricted to cells that produce cytokines after antigen contact. Here we show that de novo cell surface expression of the TNF-receptor family member CD137 (4-1 BB) identifies recently activated, but not resting, human CD4(+) and CD8(+) memory T cells. Maximum CD137 expression level is uniformly observed in both T-cell subsets at 24h after stimulation with antigen. In experiments with CMV and EBV-reactive T cells, we confirmed the specificity of CD137 expression by co-staining with peptide/HLA tetramers. Substantial proportions of CD137(+) T cells did not produce IFN-gamma, suggesting that CD137 detects a broader repertoire of antigen-specific T cells. Activated CD137(+) T cells could be easily purified by MACS and expanded in vitro thereafter. This CD137-based enrichment method was capable of isolating 2-fold higher numbers of anti-viral CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells compared to the IFN-gamma secretion assay. In conclusion, antigen-triggered CD137 expression allows the rapid detection and sorting of virus-reactive CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. The CD137 assay is most attractive for the simultaneous targeting of anti-viral T helper and effector cells in monitoring studies and adoptive immunotherapy trials. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available