4.5 Article

The utility of long-term blood pressure variability for cardiovascular risk prediction in primary care

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 522-529

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001923

Keywords

blood pressure; coronary disease; risk; risk assessment; stroke

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research (NIHR SPCR)
  2. NIHR Research Professorship
  3. NIHR Oxford CLAHRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Blood pressure (BP) is a long-established risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). SBP is used in all widely used cardiovascular risk scores for clinical decisionmaking. Recently, within-person BP variability has been shown to be a major predictor of CVD. We investigated whether cardiovascular risk scores could be improved by incorporating BP variability with standard risk factors. Methods: We used cohort data on patients aged 40-74 on 1 January 2005, from English general practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a research database derived from electronic health records. Data were linked to hospital episodes and mortality data. SBP variability independent of the mean was calculated across up to six clinic visits. We divided data geographically into derivation and validation data sets. In the derivation data set, we developed a reference model, incorporating risk factors used in previous scores and an index model, incorporating the same factors and BP variability. We calculated model validation statistics in the validation data set including calibration ratio and c-statistic. Results: In the derivation data set, BP variability was associated with CVD, independently of other risk factors (P = 0.005). However, in the validation data set, both models had similar c-statistic (0.7415 and 0.7419, respectively), R-2 (31.8 and 32.0, respectively) and calibration ratio (0.938 and 0.940, respectively). Conclusion: The association of BP variability with CVD is statistically significant in a large data set but does not substantially improve the performance of a cardiovascular risk score.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available