4.5 Article

Health-related quality of life and awareness of hypertension

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 29, Issue 11, Pages 2070-2074

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834bbca7

Keywords

glucose homeostasis; hypertension; obesity; quality of life

Funding

  1. Satakunta Hospital District
  2. Orion-Farmos Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background It has been shown that individuals with hypertension have poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than normotensive individuals. However, little is known about the impact of high blood pressure and the awareness to have hypertension on HRQoL. Methods In this cross-sectional population-based study, we evaluated 901 cardiovascular risk patients aged 45 to 70 years without serious comorbidities. Hypertension was detected in 497 (55%) of the patients, in whom 137 (28%) had previously undiagnosed hypertension confirmed with home blood pressure measurement. Before the diagnosis of hypertension was made, the patients filled Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) to assess their HRQoL. Glucose homeostasis was assessed with 2 h oral glucose tolerance test. Results Patients who were aware of their hypertension had lower scores in physical functioning and general health than patients without hypertension and patients who were unaware of hypertension. There were no differences for mental components of SF-36 between these study groups. The prevalence of obesity and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes was higher in patients with known hypertension than among other study groups. Conclusion Impaired HRQoL in hypertensive patients might be secondary to the awareness of hypertension, adverse drug effects, newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes or obesity, not high blood pressure per se. J Hypertens 29: 2070-2074 (C) 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available