4.5 Review

Time to re-appraise the role of alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists in the management of hypertension?

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 1796-1803

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833b912c

Keywords

alpha-blockers; doxazosin; gastrointestinal therapeutic system; hypertension; metabolic effects

Funding

  1. Pfizer Inc.
  2. Pfizer
  3. Novartis
  4. Servier
  5. Merck-Schering-Plough
  6. AstraZeneca
  7. Sanofi
  8. Boeringer
  9. Merck
  10. Roche Diagnostics
  11. Takeda and research
  12. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0509-10222] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists (alpha-blockers) in the management of hypertension continues to evolve. Recent data support their use as add-on therapy in uncontrolled hypertension when used in combination with all other major classes of antihypertensive drug and there is increasing evidence suggesting that they have modest but significant beneficial effects on lipid and glucose metabolism. The availability of extended-release formulations has contributed to an excellent tolerability profile. New data from an observational analysis of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) suggest that doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) used as a third-line antihypertensive agent lowered blood pressure and caused modest reductions in plasma lipids. Furthermore, use of doxazosin in ASCOT was not associated with an increased risk of heart failure, in contrast to the earlier finding of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). Overall, currently available data support the use of alpha-blockers as safe, well tolerated and effective add-on antihypertensive drugs, which have additional favourable metabolic effects. J Hypertens 28:1796-1803 (C) 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available