4.5 Article

Changes in Observed Daily Precipitation over the United States between 1950-79 and 1980-2009

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 105-121

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-12-062.1

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes in observed daily precipitation over the conterminous United States between two 30-yr periods (1950-79 and 1980-2009) are examined using a 60-yr daily precipitation analysis obtained from the Climate Prediction Center (CPC) Unified Raingauge Database. Several simple measures are used to characterize the changes, including mean, frequency, intensity, and return period. Seasonality is accounted for by examining each measure for four nonoverlapping seasons. The possible role of the El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) cycle as an explanation for differences between the two periods is also examined. There have been more light (1 mm <= P < 10 mm), moderate (10 mm <= P < 25 mm), and heavy (P >= 25 mm) daily precipitation events (P) in many regions of the country during the more recent 30-yr period with some of the largest and most spatially coherent increases over the Great Plains and lower Mississippi Valley during autumn and winter. Some regions, such as portions of the Southeast and the Pacific Northwest, have seen decreases, especially during the winter. Increases in multiday heavy precipitation events have been observed in the more recent period, especially over portions of the Great Plains, Great Lakes, and Northeast. These changes are associated with changes in the mean and frequency of daily precipitation during the more recent 30-yr period. Difference patterns are strongly related to the ENSO cycle and are consistent with the stronger El Nino events during the more recent 30-yr period. Return periods for both heavy and light daily precipitation events during 1950-79 are shorter during 1980-2009 at most locations, with some notable regional exceptions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available