Journal
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 66-83Publisher
AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2010JHM1307.1
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) [NA06OAR4310075, NA08OAR4320899, NA17RJ1232]
- U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) [06HQGR0190]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A drought monitoring system (DMS) can help to detect and characterize drought conditions and reduce adverse drought impacts. The authors evaluate how a DMS for Washington State, based on a land surface model (LSM), would perform. The LSM represents current soil moisture (SM), snow water equivalent (SWE), and runoff over the state. The DMS incorporates the standardized precipitation index (SPI), standardized runoff index (SRI), and soil moisture percentile (SMP) taken from the LSM. Four historical drought events (1976-77,1987-89,2000-01, and 2004-05) are constructed using DMS indicators of SPI/SRI-3, SPI/SRI-6, SPI/SRI-12, SPI/SRI-24, SPI/SRI-36, and SMP, with monthly updates, in each of the state's 62 Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIAs). The authors also compare drought triggers based on DMS indicators with the evolution of drought conditions and management decisions during the four droughts. The results show that the DMS would have detected the onset and recovery of drought conditions, in many cases, up to four months before state declarations.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available