4.7 Article

Scaling of increased dissolved organic carbon inputs by forest clear-cutting - What arrives downstream?

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 508, Issue -, Pages 299-306

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.056

Keywords

Boreal forest; Clear-cutting; Dissolved organic carbon; Scaling; Harvesting threshold

Funding

  1. CMF, Future Forests
  2. Formas (ForWater)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Forest clear-cutting has been found to significantly increase concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in boreal first-order streams. Here, we address the questions of (1) how the additional inputs of DOC by upstream forest harvesting affect downstream locations within a stream network and (2) what catchment area has to be harvested to cause a significant downstream increase in DOC concentration. We combined the use of primary data from a paired-catchment experiment, clear-cut history of a nested stream network derived from satellite images with a mixing-model approach in order to quantify the importance of upstream clear-cuts on two downstream sites with different catchment sizes. Modeled [DOC] agreed well with the measured concentrations in the smaller, 8.7 km(2) catchment located above a larger wetland area, but discrepancies occurred for the larger 22.9 km(2) catchment located downstream of the wetland. Estimates of the critical area (A(critical)) needed to be harvested to cause a significant impact on downstream DOC concentrations was quantified to be 11% for p < 0.05 and 23-25% for p < 0.001. Our results suggests that (i) increased DOC concentrations induced by forest harvesting affect downstream sites and (ii) additional DOC inputs by harvests have a significant impact on stream water quality, if harvests exceed A(critical). We suggest that the estimates of A(critical) could be used in sensitive river networks to provide harvesting-thresholds. The latter could be implemented into forest planning that includes considerations of the negative impact of clear-cutting on water quality. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available