4.7 Article

Performance evaluation of radar and satellite rainfalls for Typhoon Morakot over Taiwan: Are remote-sensing products ready for gauge denial scenario of extreme events?

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 506, Issue -, Pages 4-13

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.026

Keywords

Rainfall; Radar; Satellite; Typhoon Morakot

Funding

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Severe Storms Laboratory Grant through Advanced Radar Research Center
  2. Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing Lab at the University of Oklahoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated rainfall estimates from ground radar network and four satellite algorithms with a relatively dense rain gauge network over Taiwan Island for the 2009 extreme Typhoon Morakot at various spatiotemporal scales (from 0.04 degrees to 0.25 degrees and hourly to event total accumulation). The results show that all the remote-sensing products underestimate the rainfall as compared to the rain gauge measurements, in an order of radar (-18%), 3B42RT (-19%), PERSIANN-CCS (28%), 3842V6 (-36%), and CMORPH (-61%). The ground radar estimates are also most correlated with gauge measurements, having a correlation coefficient (CC) of 0.81 (0.82) at 0.04 degrees (0.25 degrees) spatial resolution. For satellite products, CMORPH has the best spatial correlation (0.70) but largely underestimates the total rainfall accumulation. Compared to microwave ingested algorithms, the IR-dominant algorithms provide a better estimation of the total rainfall accumulation but poorly resolve the temporal evolution of the warm cloud typhoon, especially for a large overestimation at the early storm stage. This study suggests that the best performance comes from the ground radar estimates that could be used as an alternative in case of the gauge denial. However, the current satellite rainfall products still have limitations in terms of resolution and accuracy, especially for this type of extreme typhoon. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available