4.7 Article

Estimation of annual baseflow at ungauged sites in Indiana USA

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 476, Issue -, Pages 13-27

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.002

Keywords

Baseflow; Baseflow index; Flow prediction in ungauged basin

Funding

  1. Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant, College Program Research and Outreach Development and Capacity Building Projects
  2. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)-Great Lakes Restoration Initiative program
  3. USEPA-Region 5 Water Division

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed regression models for predicting baseflow and baseflow index (BFI) (baseflow/total streamflow) at ungauged sites by using long-term baseflow data, land use, and watershed physiographic characteristics. Baseflow data were derived from daily streamflow records with a recursive digital filter method for baseflow separation for 22 watersheds in Indiana. Filtered average annual baseflow varies between 150 and 320 mm for the study watersheds. BFI varies between 0.40 to 0.88 with an average of 0.60, suggesting that 60% of long-term streamflow in Indiana is likely supported by ground water discharge and shallow subsurface flow. Three regression equations (one for baseflow and one for BR) were developed and evaluated in the study watersheds. Results showed that the models reasonably estimate baseflow with relative errors (RE) ranging from 0% to 30%, except in one watershed where the RE was 50% during the validation period. These equations can be used to estimate baseflow and BFI at ungauged sites in Indiana. The present work would have implications for improving the capabilities of simple hydrologic/water quality models, and support planning and management of water resources. The methodology used in this study can be applied in other locations and regions. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available