4.7 Article

Estimating river bathymetry from data assimilation of synthetic SWOT measurements

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 464, Issue -, Pages 363-375

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.07.028

Keywords

SWOT; Hydrologic/hydraulic modeling; Data assimilation; Ensemble Kalman Filter; River bathymetry; River discharge

Funding

  1. Ohio State University Climate, Water and Carbon program
  2. NASA Physical Oceanography Grant [NNX10AE96G]
  3. NASA Headquarters under the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program-Grant [NNX11AL60H]
  4. Ohio Supercomputer Center [PAS0503]
  5. NASA [134848, NNX10AE96G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on estimating river bathymetry for retrieving river discharge from the upcoming Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite mission using a data assimilation algorithm coupled with a hydrodynamic model. The SWOT observations will include water surface elevation (WSE), its spatial and temporal derivatives, and inundated area. We assimilated synthetic SWOT observations into the LISFLOOD-FP hydrodynamic model using a local ensemble batch smoother (LEnBS), simultaneously estimating river bathymetry and flow depth. SWOT observations were obtained by sampling a true LISFLOOD-FP simulation based on the SWOT instrument design; the true discharge boundary condition was derived from USGS gages. The first-guess discharge boundary conditions were produced by the Variable Infiltration Capacity model, with discharge uncertainty controlled via precipitation uncertainty. First-guess estimates of bathymetry were derived from SWOT observations assuming a uniform spatial depth; bathymetric variability was modeled using an exponential correlation function. Thus, discharge and bathymetry errors were modeled realistically. The LEnBS recovered the bathymetry from SWOT observations with 0.52 m reach-average root mean square error (RMSE), which was 67.8% less than the first-guess RMSE. The RMSE of bathymetry estimates decreased sequentially as more SWOT observations were used in the estimate; we illustrate sequential processing of 6 months of SWOT observations. The better estimates of bathymetry lead to improved discharge estimates. The normalized RMSE of the river discharge estimates was 10.5%, 71.2% less than the first-guess error. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available