4.7 Article

Hydrogeological characterization of seawater intrusion in tidally-forced coastal fractured bedrock aquifer

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 446, Issue -, Pages 77-89

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.033

Keywords

Seawater intrusion; Coastal fractured aquifer; Pumping; Tide; Time series analysis; Flowmeter test

Funding

  1. Korea Research Foundation
  2. Korean Government [KRF-2008-313-0009.25]
  3. Korea Ministry of Environment [173-092-009]
  4. Chonnam National University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrogeological investigation was carried out to characterize seawater intrusion in a tidally-forced coastal fractured bedrock aquifer in the west coast of Korea peninsular, which was also subject to heavy groundwater extraction. Times series analysis, using the data of electrical conductivity (EC), groundwater level and tidal oscillation, showed that intensive groundwater extraction from the wells near the shore caused a severe seawater intrusion. The geophysical loggings and hydraulic tests indicated that the tidally-forced coastal fractured aquifer in the study area was characterized by the shallow fresh groundwater, transition zone, and deep high saline water zone. The extent of seawater intrusion highly depended on conductive fractures and their hydraulic connectivity. In the deep saline water layer, progressive seawater intrusion took place mainly by persistent intensive pumping and in part by tidal activity. The conductive fractures acted as a pathway for saline water flow from the deep saline water zone to the transition zone, when groundwater was extracted. The extent of transition zone depended on the change of groundwater level by groundwater pumping or recharge. This study indicated that a persistent intensive extraction of groundwater would intensify seawater intrusion in tidally-forced coastal fractured aquifer and proper measures would be required to prevent it. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available