4.7 Article

An instream ecological flow method for data-scarce regulated rivers

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 398, Issue 1-2, Pages 17-25

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.026

Keywords

Instream ecological flow (IEF); Instream Ecological Water-level (IEW); Data-scarce rivers; The Huai River

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [40971023]
  2. Opening Foundation of the China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research [IWHRKF201001]
  3. National Key Special Project of Sci-tech for water pollution control and regulation [2008ZX07010-006]
  4. Post-Doc Science Foundation, PR China [20100470022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reliability of traditional methodologies is often challenged in determination of instream ecological flow (IEF) for a regulated river due to its non-natural condition. This paper deals with an IEF determination method for regulated rivers called the Adapted Ecological Hydraulic Radius Approach (AEHRA). It considers information of both instream ecosystem and river course, while it does not require any flow regime. Beside monthly IEF, it outputs monthly Instream Ecological Water-level (IEW) as well. The latter can greatly facilitate dam operation. Application of this method to the Huai River which is completely regulated by dams suggest: (1) AEHRA is especially predictive for rivers with limited ecological and hydrological data; (2) it can reflect the seasonal variation of IEF and IEW; (3) errors of AEHRA introduced by using a geometric shape generalized cross-section in an un-gauged site are generally acceptable; (4) comparison of the IEF values estimated by AEHRA with those by Tennant approach, Wetted Perimeter method and R2CROSS method showed fairly good agreement in terms of practical capability of the AEHRA. This method will be of great help for regionally sustainable water management in data-scarce regulated rivers (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available