4.7 Article

Inverse modeling for characterization of uncertainty in transport parameters under uncertainty of source geometry in heterogeneous aquifers

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 405, Issue 3-4, Pages 402-416

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.039

Keywords

Inverse modeling; Natural attenuation; NAPL source; Stochastic simulation; Aquifer characterization; Contaminant transport

Funding

  1. Alberta Ingenuity Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In petroleum hydrocarbon contamination scenarios, assessment of the dimensions of contaminant plumes and prediction of their fate requires predictions of the rate of dissolution of contaminants from residual non-aqueous-phase-liquid (NAPLs) into the aquifer and the rate of contaminant removal through biodegradation. The central idea in this paper is to present an inverse modeling methodology for characterization of structural uncertainty in these parameters by tailoring their estimation to the distributions of source geometry and hydraulic conductivity field. For this purpose, a synthetic study site with two reference cases is established and a Monte Carlo type inverse modeling methodology is presented where dissolution and first-order biodegradation rates of the contaminants are estimated for joint realizations of source and hydraulic conductivity. The joint realizations are constructed by the distance-function (DF) and sequential self-calibration (SSC) approaches and a gradient-based optimization is adapted to solve the inversion problem. The results show larger uncertainty in the estimated dissolution rate and a moderate positive correlation between the two parameters. It is also observed that tailoring the estimation of the parameters to the constructed joint realizations can effectively reduce the uncertainty in the shape and size of the plume, and this uncertainty, as well as the uncertainty in the source size, can be further reduced by ranking and screening the conditional realizations based on the value of the objective function. The effects of measurement errors in head and concentration observations on uncertainty in the predicted parameters are shown to be as expected; measurement error translates to substantially greater uncertainty. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available