4.7 Article

Upward groundwater flow in boils as the dominant mechanism of salinization in deep polders, The Netherlands

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 394, Issue 3-4, Pages 494-506

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.009

Keywords

Boils; Salinization; Seepage; Deep polder; Chloride load; Preferential flow

Funding

  1. Wageningen University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As upward seepage of saline groundwater from the upper aquifer is leading to surface water salinization of deep polders in the Netherlands we monitored the processes involved in the Noordplas Polder a typical deep polder Our results show three types of seepage (1) diffuse seepage through the Holocene confining layer (2) seepage through paleochannel belts in the Holocene layer and (3) Intense seepage via localized boils They differ with regard to seepage flux chloride concentration and their location in the polder thus their contributions to surface water salinization also differ Permeable sandy paleochannel belts cut through the lower part of the Holocene layer resulting in higher seepage fluxes than the diffuse seepage through the Holocene layer where there are no paleochannels The average chloride concentration of paleochannel seepage is about 600 mg/l which is sixfold higher than the average concentration of diffuse seepage The highest seepage fluxes and chloride concentrations are found at boils which are small vents in the Holocene layer through which groundwater preferentially discharges at high velocities This results in upconing of deeper and more saline groundwater which produces an average chloride concentration of 1100 mg/l Despite the fact that seepage fluxes are difficult to measure we were able to calculate that boils contribute more than 50% of the total chloride load entering the Noordplas Polder and they therefore form the dominant salinization pathway (C) 2010 Elsevier BV All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available