4.7 Article

Artificial neural networks for estimating regional arsenic concentrations in a blackfoot disease area in Taiwan

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 388, Issue 1-2, Pages 65-76

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.029

Keywords

Arsenic; Artificial neural networks (ANNs); Over-fitting; Leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation; Modified performance function (MPF); Principal component analysis (PCA)

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan, ROC [NSC 95-2313-B-002-051-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High arsenic concentrations in groundwater have been detected in the south-western coastal area of Taiwan. In this study, artificial neural networks (ANNs) were investigated for their applicability to recovering the missing arsenic data and constructing the spatial distribution of arsenic concentration based on the arsenic concentration data of 28 groundwater observation wells Due to a limited number of data sets, several strategies were proposed to construct the backpropagation neural networks (BPNs) The leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation was adopted to diminish the bias in choosing validation data, and the modified performance function (MPF) was applied to reducing an over-fitting situation Principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to transform the arsenic concentration of the regional wells into a limited number of main factors that were used as the input variables for the ANNs. Results showed that the 100 cross-validation was an effective tool for model selection, and the parameter, gamma, of MPF played an important role for reducing errors in the model training and validation processes and alleviating the problem of over-fitting. Although sparse data sets have been used to construct ANNs, the models still achieved acceptable performance. The predicted spatial distribution of the arsenic concentration can provide useful information to local residents when groundwater achieves high levels of arsenic concentrations in non-functioning groundwater monitoring wells (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available