4.7 Article

Analytical assessment and parameter estimation of a low-dimensional groundwater model

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 377, Issue 1-2, Pages 143-154

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.018

Keywords

Groundwater; Boussinesq; Model assessment; Analytical parameter estimation; Brutsaert and Nieber method

Funding

  1. New Zealand Foundation [C01X0308]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A class of transient groundwater models exists between the simple 0-dimensional storage-discharge functions and numerically-solved 2- and 3-dimensional spatially-distributed models This class contains analytical solutions to linear partial differential equations subjected to time-varying stress, such as recharge or pumping These solutions are limited to homogeneous 1-dimensional (1-D) representations of an aquifer Their use in watershed models is rare to date, even though they are computationally efficient and overcome some of the major weaknesses of single-valued storage-discharge functions. Because these 1-D models have analytical solutions for hydraulic head and groundwater discharge. they allow both for a simpler initial assessment of model Suitability and for initial estimation of model parameters using analytical methods. We evaluate two analytical, graphical parameter estimation methods whereby (1) the second time derivative of a state (in this case, a volume) is plotted against the first derivative of the same state. and (2) the first time derivative of one state (volume) is plotted against another state (piezometric height). In both cases the identification of a data envelope is used to estimate model parameters. or groupings thereof. We use both methods to assess the suitability of a 1-D model to ail alluvial plain system in New Zealand and examine the limitations of two graphical envelope techniques for estimating aquifer parameters at the catchment scale (C) 2009 Elsevier B V All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available