4.7 Article

Distributed whole city water level measurements from the Carlisle 2005 urban flood event and comparison with hydraulic model simulations

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 368, Issue 1-4, Pages 42-55

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.026

Keywords

Urban flooding; Hydraulic modelling; Model validation; Carlisle

Funding

  1. Flood Risk management Research Consortium (FRMRC)
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/S76304]
  3. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/D521222/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flood inundation modelling on urbanised floodplains has become more feasible due to the increased availability of high resolution digital terrain data and computer power. However, studies that validate simulations with spatially distributed measurements are rare, especially for large events. This paper reports one of the most comprehensive validation data sets available to date on an urban flood, collected in January 2005 after a major event in the city of Carlisle, UK. For the first time this case study collated distributed urban maximum water level and extent measurements with gauged hydrographs, LiDAR elevation data and digital Mastermap (R) data. These data were used to build and calibrate two 2D diffusion wave models at the whole city scale, based on digital elevation data with and without buildings. RMSE between measured and simulated maximum water level was 0.32 m and 0.28 m for the models with and without buildings, respectively, the latter being more accurate due to blockages on the floodplain when building heights were included in the topography. The magnitude of simulation errors compared well with other studies in the literature, and considering potential errors in the measurement data indicates that the diffusion wave approach was adequate to capture the first-order physics relevant here, although a global channel roughness parameter was unable to capture the full spatially-varying dynamics of the flood event. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available