4.7 Article

Analysis of runoff-storage relationships to evaluate the runoff-buffering potential of a sloping permeable domain

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 360, Issue 1-4, Pages 132-146

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.023

Keywords

macropores; rainfall-runoff response; Richards equation; runoff -buffering potential; soil physical properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The runoff-storage relationship for a runoff system in a steady-state is analyzed as an indicator of the buffering potential of rainfall-runoff responses. In this relationship, a large storage increase in response to a given runoff increase indicates high buffering potential in the water balance equation. The evaluation method is applied to a sloping permeable domain. A two-dimensional form of the Richards equation is used to calculate runoff and storage. Macropore existence is represented by an enlargement effect of hydraulic conductivity near saturation. The runoff-storage relationship is controlled by the distribution of hydraulic quantities. The distribution of a pressure-head value is approximately classified into the following three zones: the I zone with vertical unsaturated flow, the U zone with unsaturated downslope flow, and the S zone with saturated downslope flow. The runoff -buffering potential is systematically evaluated by dependencies of the runoff-storage relationship on the classification of the pressure-head distribution. The potential is generally high for soil with a high permeability, but rather small in the range of Low runoff rates where the S zone is not created. The macropore effect causes the range of high buffering potential to shift to high runoff rates through enlargement of the I zone. As a result, a moderate magnitude of the macropore effect gives the maximum increase in storage in response to a given increase in runoff. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All. rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available