4.4 Article

Study of the Xinanjiang Model Parameter Calibration

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 1513-1521

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000527

Keywords

Parameters; Calibration; Optimization; Hydrologic models; SCE-UA method; Xinanjiang model; Parameter calibration; Objective optimization method; Combined method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Xinanjiang model parameter calibration is an optimization problem that aims to determine the values of model parameters that provide the best fit between observed and estimated flows. Many researchers have used the shuffled complex evolution (SCE-UA) algorithm in the Xinanjiang model parameter calibration and have found some problems in its application. Identifying methods in choosing an objective function, the amount of calibration data to be used, and the best calibration steps in searching for the best parameters are just some of the application problems that must be solved. The goal of the present study is to resolve the aforementioned problems. This work calibrates the Xinanjiang model for the Yuetan basin in China based on the SCE-UA method. In the objective function study, six objective functions are commonly used. Results demonstrate that the water quantity balance error function is the best choice in both daily and hourly Xinanjiang model calibrations. During the experiment, 20 sets of observed data with length differences of 1-20years are used. The results reveal that data amounting to a period of 16years are needed to obtain a relatively stable parameter set. Meanwhile, the objective optimization method is introduced in the calibration step study. This method combines the coupling of the objective optimization method with the SCE-UA algorithm. Parameter calibration results reveal that the combined method can increase the calibration speed and reduce the influence of the calibration data period on the results. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available