4.5 Article

Supervised committee machine with artificial intelligence for prediction of fluoride concentration

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 1474-1490

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2013.008

Keywords

artificial intelligence; artificial neural network; committee machine; fuzzy logic; ground water quality; neuro-fuzzy

Funding

  1. Iran Ministry of Science, Research and Technology
  2. Iran's National Elites Foundation
  3. United States Geological Survey [G10AP00136]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a supervised committee machine with artificial intelligence (SCMAI) method to predict fluoride in ground water of Maku, Iran. Ground water is the main source of drinking water for the area. Management of fluoride anomaly needs better prediction of fluoride concentration. However, the complex hydrogeological characteristics cause difficulties to accurately predict fluoride concentration in basaltic formation, non-basaltic formation, and mixing zone. SCMAI predicts fluoride by a nonlinear combination of individual Al models through an artificial intelligent system. Factor analysis is used to identify effective fluoride-correlated hydrochemical parameters as input to Al models. Four Al models, Sugeno fuzzy logic, Mamdani fuzzy logic, artificial neural network (ANN), and neuro-fuzzy are employed to predict fluoride concentration. The results show that all of these models have similar fitting to the fluoride data in the Maku area, and do not predict well for samples in the mixing zone. The SCMAI employs an ANN model to re-predict the fluoride concentration based on the four Al model predictions. The result shows improvement to the CMAI method, a committee machine with the linear combination of Al model predictions. The results also show significant fitting improvement to individual Al models, especially for fluoride prediction in the mixing zone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available