4.2 Article

3D Flow and Sediment Dynamics in a Laboratory Channel Bend with and without Stream Barbs

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
Volume 139, Issue 2, Pages 154-166

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000655

Keywords

Channel bend; Stream barbs; Groynes; Laboratory experiment; Secondary flow; Local scour; Submerged groynes

Funding

  1. Green Municipal Fund (Canada)
  2. City of Ottawa
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
  4. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  5. Ontario Government's Ontario Graduate Scholarship program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of laboratory flume experiments were performed to study the effect of stream barbs on flow field dynamics and sediment erosion in a 135 degrees mobile-bed channel bend. Stream barbs (also known as spur dikes or submerged groynes) are low-profile linear rock features that redirect high velocity flow away from the outer bank of channel bends. Unlike emergent groynes, the submerged nature of these structures creates a unique combination of horizontal shear (plunging type flow) and vertical shear (at the groyne tip). Spatially dense, high frequency velocity data were collected and analyzed to describe the pattern and magnitude of three-dimensional (3D) velocity throughout the bend and in the vicinity of the stream barbs. This paper demonstrates that the outer bank region (particularly between barbs) may still be at risk of erosion (or even increased erosion greater than the same case without barbs) if stream barbs generate excessive secondary velocities (because of their size and layout) that are opposing the primary secondary flow naturally occurring in channel bends. Characterizing the role of flow field dynamics on the pattern of deposition and erosion through experimental measurements provided valuable data about how such flow features contribute to local scour, and about the performance of these structures. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000655. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available