4.2 Article

Temporal Variation of Scour Depth at Nonuniform Cylindrical Piers

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
Volume 137, Issue 1, Pages 45-56

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000272

Keywords

Bridge pier; Nonuniform pier; Steady flow; Unsteady flow; Time dependence; Scour; Sediment transport

Funding

  1. National Science Council of the R.O.C.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper proposes a semiempirical model to estimate the temporal development of scour depth at cylindrical piers with unexposed foundations. A cylindrical pier with a foundation is considered as nonuniform pier. The concept of primary vortex and the principle of volumetric rate of sediment transport are used to develop a methodology to characterize the rate of evolution of the scour hole at nonuniform cylindrical piers. The model also simulates the entire scouring process at nonuniform cylindrical piers having the discontinuous surface located below the initial bed level. The scouring process includes three zones; viz Zone 1 having the scouring phenomenon similar to that of a uniform pier, Zone 2 in which the scour depth remains unchanged with its value equal to the depth of the top level of foundation below the initial bed level while the dimensions of the scour hole increase, and in Zone 3 the geometry pier foundation influences the scouring process. A concept of superposition using an effective pier diameter is proposed to simulate the scouring process in Zone 3. In addition, the laboratory experiments were conducted to utilize the laboratory results for the validation of the model. The simulated results obtained from the proposed model are in good agreement with the present experimental results and also other experimental data. Also, the effect of unsteadiness of flow is incorporated in the model and the results of the model are compared with the experimental data. The model agrees satisfactorily with the experimental data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available