4.2 Article

Long-term effects of aldosterone blockade in resistant hypertension associated with chronic kidney disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages 502-506

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2011.60

Keywords

aldosterone; chronic kidney disease; resistant hypertension; hyperkalemia; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists

Funding

  1. NHLBI [RO1-HL79040, T32 HL007457]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypertension is a major risk factor for the development and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are effective in the management of resistant hypertension but are not widely used in CKD because of the risk of hyperkalemia. We retrospectively evaluated the long-term effects and safety of MRAs added to a pre-existing antihypertensive regimen in subjects with resistant hypertension associated with stage 3 CKD. In all, 32 patients were treated with spironolactone and 4 with eplerenone for a median follow-up of 312 days. MRAs induced a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure from 162 +/- 22 to 138 +/- 14 mm Hg (P<0.0001) and in diastolic blood pressure from 87 +/- 17 to 74 +/- 12 mm Hg P<0.0001). Serum potassium increased from 4.0 +/- 0.5 to 4.4 +/- 0.5 mEq l(-1) (P = 0.0001), with the highest value being 5.8 mEq l(-1). The serum creatinine increased from 1.5 +/- 0.3 to 1.8 +/- 0.5 mg dl(-1) (P = 0.0004) and the estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased from 48.6 +/- 8.7 to 41.2 +/- 11.5 ml min(-1) per 1.73 m(2) (P = 0.0002). One case of acute renal failure and three cases of significant hyperkalemia occurred. MRAs significantly reduced blood pressure in subjects with resistant hypertension associated with stage 3 CKD, although close biochemical monitoring is recommended because of an increased risk of hyperkalemia and worsening of renal function. Journal of Human Hypertension (2012) 26, 502-506; doi:10.1038/jhh.2011.60; published online 16 June 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available