4.2 Article

Behavioural and psychosocial correlates of nondipping blood pressure pattern among middle-aged men and women at work

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 381-387

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2011.42

Keywords

nondipping; blood pressure; psychosocial

Funding

  1. Belgian Federal Public Service Employment, Labour and Social Dialogue
  2. European Social Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The underlying pathogenetic mechanisms of nondipping blood pressure (BP) pattern are not completely understood. Especially the role of psychosocial correlates remains unclear. The aim was to assess the association between nondipping BP pattern, behavioural and psychosocial factors in a sample of working men and women. The study sample included 167 working men and women aged 40-64 years from the BELSTRESS cohort. Socio-demographic, behavioural and psychosocial factors were assessed by self-administered questionnaires. Participants were medically examined and underwent an ambulatory BP monitoring during 24 h. Nondipping was defined when the average nocturnal decline in BP was <10%. The prevalence of nondipping for both systolic and diastolic BP was 7.8%. Nondipping was not significantly related to smoking, alcohol consumption and leisure time physical activity. A crude significant association was observed between nondipping and sleep problems. After adjusting for gender, education and body mass index, the risk for nondipping was associated with job strain, living alone, being unsatisfied about the contact with one's children, depressive symptoms and vital exhaustion. Nondipping BP pattern was consistently related to psychosocial factors in this study: positive associations were observed with measures of job strain, poor private life support (living alone and being unsatisfied about the contact with one's children) and mental health problems (depressive symptoms and vital exhaustion). Journal of Human Hypertension (2012) 26, 381-387; doi:10.1038/jhh.2011.42; published online 5 May 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available