4.2 Review

Mitigation of calcium channel blocker-related oedema in hypertension by antagonists of the renin-angiotensin system

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 503-511

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2008.157

Keywords

angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers; calcium channel blockers; oedema

Funding

  1. Daiichi-Sankyo Europe

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review is aimed at examining calcium channel blocker (CCB)-related oedema and how this can be attenuated through the use of agents that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system. CCBs are effective antihypertensive agents, but their propensity for causing oedema may reduce compliance. A review of the literature has indicated that the absolute incidence of this side effect is difficult to determine because reported rates vary widely, a factor that may stem from differences in the surveillance technique ( active vs passive). In a recent trial incorporating active surveillance, 25% of patients who received amlodipine 10mg per day experienced oedema. CCB-induced oedema is caused by increased capillary hydrostatic pressure that results from preferential dilation of pre-capillary vessels. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) cause post-capillary dilation and normalize hydrostatic pressure, and are thus ideally suited for prevention/reversal of CCB-induced oedema. The efficacy of this strategy was proven using both subjective and objective techniques. ARB/CCB and ACEI/CCB combination therapy is also more effective than CCB monotherapy in controlling blood pressure. These combinations represent an important advance in the management of hypertension. Journal of Human Hypertension ( 2009) 23, 503-511; doi: 10.1038/jhh.2008.157; published online 15 January 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available