4.4 Article

A nonsynonymous variant of IL1A is associated with endometriosis in Japanese population

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 58, Issue 8, Pages 517-520

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2013.32

Keywords

endometriosis; interleukin-1 alpha; Japanese; single-nucleotide polymorphism

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23510242] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our previous genome-wide association study has demonstrated that single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in intronic and downstream regions of IL1A (interleukin 1 alpha) were associated with the risk of endometriosis. These SNPs on the genome-wide association study platform could be only surrogates for the true causal variant. Thus, we resequenced all the exons of IL1A in 377 patients with endometriosis and 457 healthy controls. We detected seven rare variants (minor allele frequency<0.01) and four common variants. All the rare variants were not associated with endometriosis. The four common variants (rs17561, rs1304037, rs2856836 and rs3783553) in IL1A were significantly associated with endometriosis (P = 0.0024, 0.0024, 0.0014 and 0.0061, respectively). All the four SNPs were within a linkage disequilibrium block. Among them, only rs17561 was nonsynonymous (p.A114S), which has been reported to be associated with susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Taken together, we examined association between rs17561 and endometriosis in an independent validation data set (524 patients and 533 healthy controls) replicating significant association (P = 4.0 x 10(-5); odds ratio (OR), 1.91; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.41-2.61). Meta-analysis by combining results from the two stages strengthened the evidence of association (P = 2.5 x 10(-7); OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.49-2.43). Our findings demonstrated that the nonsynonymous variant of IL1A might confer genetic susceptibility to endometriosis in Japanese population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available