4.4 Article

Mutations in PRRT2 responsible for paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesias also cause benign familial infantile convulsions

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 57, Issue 5, Pages 338-341

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2012.23

Keywords

benign familial infantile convulsion; mutation analysis; paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia; PRRT2

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22591263, 24659535, 22132004, 22390066, 22227002, 23659529, 21249062] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (PKD (MIM128000)) is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent attacks of involuntary movements. Benign familial infantile convulsion (BFIC) is also one of a neurological disorder characterized by clusters of epileptic seizures. The BFIC1 (MIM601764), BFIC2 (MIM605751) and BFIC4 (MIM612627) loci have been mapped to chromosome 19q, 16p and 1p, respectively, while BFIC3 (MIM607745) is caused by mutations in SCN2A on chromosome 2q24. Furthermore, patients with BFIC have been observed in a family concurrently with PKD. Both PKD and BFIC2 are heritable paroxysmal disorders and map to the same region on chromosome 16. Recently, the causative gene of PKD, the protein-rich transmembrane protein 2 (PRRT2), has been detected using whole-exome sequencing. We performed mutation analysis of PRRT2 by direct sequencing in 81 members of 17 families containing 15 PKD families and two BFIC families. Direct sequencing revealed that two mutations, c.649dupC and c.748C>T, were detected in all members of the PKD and BFIC families. Our results suggest that BFIC2 is caused by a truncated mutation that also causes PKD. Thus, PKD and BFIC2 are genetically identical and may cause convulsions and involuntary movements via a similar mechanism. Journal of Human Genetics (2012) 57, 338-341; doi:10.1038/jhg.2012.23; published online 8 March 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available